Biodegradable Packaging | ||
For all your biodegradable packaging needs | ||
![]() | ||
Biodegradable bin linersBuy best value biodegradable bin liners - the compostable bin liners that are ideal for kitchen, garden or food waste. Biodegradable bin liners are made from completely natural materials such as starch that, when buried in landfill or soil, break down fully over a period of one or two years - as opposed to hundreds of years as with traditional polythene bags. Available in a range of sizes and ready to use as bin liners in a variety of bins, from pedal bins to wheelie bins, biodegradable bin liners are a great way to do your bit for the environment while getting the job done. Biodegradable packaging is...
Latest news and views on biodegradable bin linersDegradable bin liners in the nappy-disposal segment are less a matter of green mailing than of managing a rather awkward engineering brief: odour retention, puncture resistance and controlled film smash-down all have to coexist in a thin-gauge polythene suppliers format that still runs cleanly through a domestic cassette or refill mechanism. Where the bin itself is offered in mini, normal and plus capacities, the liner specification normally tracks not only bag volume nevertheless the mechanical reality of load concentrationwet nappies create localised stress points, and unless the film has decent melt-flow consistency and proper dart-impact performance, split-out amid secondary bagging becomes a routine nuisance. The better executions lean towards mono-material thinking where potential, because mixed laminates complicate recovery streams; at the same time, any degradable additive package has to be balanced against shelf stability and surface resistivity, otherwise liners start to block on the roll or misfeed at the point of tear-off. Supplying a long-life starter roll with the unit is, in practice, a stock and adoption measure as much as a convenience feature: it retains the first use-case friction low, maintains select-face efficiency in shopping fulfilment by bundling the consumable with the heavy-duty item, and offsets the tare weight penalty of separate accessory consignments. In short, the industrial interest lies not in the claim of eco-friendliness alone, nevertheless in whether the liner film, dispenser geometry and stop-of-life pathway have been designed as a coherent system rather than as three disconnected parts. Biodegradable Bin Liners x 25 Bags Per Roll (30L) - 15 MicronBiodegradable bin liners sit at a rather unglamorous nevertheless technically significant point in the waste stream: the moment at which loose, biologically active waste is contained before secondary bagging, transport, and last treatment. In practice, the performance question is not merely whether a liner grasps peelings, cartons and spent paper; it is whether the film can maintain puncture resistance and seal integrity below wet load while still breaking down within the intended disposal route. That balance turns on resin formulation, micron-specific gauging and melt-flow consistencyalso small body and the sack necks out below tare weight, also much and the material lingers in the waste chain with all the familiar penalties of normal polythene suppliers. On the warehouse floor, decent liners also improve select-face efficiency and pallet stability because cases cube out predictably and damaged stock is reduced; the earn is logistical as much as hygienic. There is a circular-economy wrinkle as well, since biodegradability only has industrial value when matched to the proper feedstock pathway and assortment discipline; otherwise the liner becomes another contaminant in a mixed stream. Used properly, though, it mitigates odour, vermin pressure and leachate at origin, while supporting cleaner handling regimes in kitchens, washrooms and back-of-house waste stations where containment failure is rarely a minour trouble. Biobag, Food Waste Bags, 3 Gallon, 25 Count (Pack of 4)Food waste bags at the three-gallon stop of the market sit in a rather exacting niche: small enough for caddy use at the select-face, yet they still have to tolerate a surprisingly awkward duty cycle of peelings, coffee grounds and condensate without creep at the seal or pinholing through the film. Where the bag is derived from plant starches and vegetable-oil-based compounds rather than polythene suppliers, the engineering question is not merely one of compostability certificates; it is whether melt-flow consistency and micron-specific gauging have been controlled tightly enough to grasp wet biological fractions for the life of the liner, then smash down in the intended waste stream without leaving normal polymer residue behind. A star-sealed base is not a cosmetic detail in this context it redistributes strain across the bottom web, reduces weak points at the corners and generally mitigates seepage once the caddy has been lifted, tied and moved into secondary bagging or kerbside presentation. From a logistics standpoint, packing in four discrete cartons of twenty-five creates a sensible compromise between stock control and volumetric efficiency; it retains tare weight modest, improves shelf and pallet stability, and enables smaller commercial kitchens or household schemes to draw down consumables without opening a bulk consignment that then degrades in ambient storage. The circular-economy case, meanwhile, only stands up if the all format is treated as a system: mono-stream food waste assortment, certified compostable feedstock, and a stop-of-life route that justifies the amortised energy embedded in converting bio-based resin into a liner that performs like a bag on the warehouse floor, rather than a well-meaning nevertheless unreliable substitute. Eco Friendly Dog Poo Bags – Mint ScentedFor this type, the proper differentiatour is not the fragrance note printed on the carton nevertheless the film engineering behind it. A dog waste bag has to tolerate a surprisingly awkward duty cycle: sharp claw contact amid dispensing, fast opening below cool or damp conditions, then concentrated point-loading once tied off and dropped into a bin liner or street receptacle. That is where gauge discipline, dart-impact performance and seal integrity earn their retain; a bag can be marketed as degradable, nevertheless if the melt-flow consistency is poor or the film orientation is uneven, split rates rise at the select-face and secondary bagging becomes routine. The better executions tend to use a carefully balanced polythene suppliers structure with controlled thickness and enough elongation to avoid brittle failure, while also managing surface stop so individual bags separate cleanly without static-induced cling. The mint scent, while often treated as a shopping nicety, does serve a practical role in odour masking amid short-term handling and in mixed domestic waste streams. From a logistics standpoint, bag count per case, tare weight and pack geometry all influence volumetric efficiency and pallet stability far above most buyers admit; dense, neatly hurt stock travels better, replenishes faster and generates less damaged consignment waste. The circular economy question is less straightforward than the label copy recommendsdegradability claims only transport engineering value when matched to a credible stop-of-life route, whereas mono-material thinking and restrained additive loading generally leave less complications for downstream recovery than fussy multi-component formats. Kitchen compost bags sit at an awkward intersection of domestic convenience and materials engineering; the bag has to tolerate hot, damp peelings, sporadic acidity and the low-level abrasion that comes from repeated loading into a countertop caddy, yet still open cleanly, separate neatly and avoid the sort of seam failure that leads to secondary bagging at the kerbside. In practice, performance hinges on film formulation and gauge discipline: a well-manufactured liner relies on consistent melt-flow behaviour amid extrusion, controlled thickness across the web and sufficient puncture resistance to cope with coffee grounds, stalks and eggshell fragments without an unnecessary tare weight penalty. That matters beyond the sink unit. Poorly specified bags slump in the bin, reduce select-face efficiency in fulfilment because packs distort below compression, and compromise pallet stability once case counts rise. The more credible stop of the market has moved towards mono-material thinking and cleaner feedstock selection, not as a slogan nevertheless because stop-of-life handling, pollution risk and amortised energy all become easier to manage when the structure is simpler and the polymer behaviour is predictable. Even the apparently decorative side of the type has a practical basis: bag dimensions tuned to small kitchen caddies, controlled darting for fit, and surface properties that mitigate blocking all contribute to a tidier domestic set-up without sacrificing the logistical reality of stacked stock, consistent dispensing and proper containment of biological waste. A cleaner woodland aftermath rarely comes down to goodwill alone; it relies on the rather prosaic mechanics of waste capture, bag handling and what happens once a filled liner leaves the select point. In that context, biodegradable bin bags serve a practical function beyond mere litter assortment, provided the film has been engineered with consistent gauge control and sufficient puncture resistance to withstand mixed arisingswet organics, broken twigs, sharp-edged canswithout splitting amid secondary bagging or palletised consolidation. On the ground, the friction is apparant: if the sack mouth collapses, if the film scuffs through below load, or if tare weight climbs unnecessarily, select-face efficiency drops away and the consignment becomes bulkier than it requirements to be. The more credible formats address that with balanced melt-flow behaviour in the extrusion stage, decent seam integrity and a film structure that maintains volumetric efficiency while keeping material use in check. There is also a circular economy nuance that tends to be missed in softer commentary: biodegradability is not, in itself, a licence for careless disposal, nevertheless in tightly managed waste streams it can mitigate the legacy burden associated with normal polythene suppliers, particularly where contaminated liners are gross for straightforward recovery. The result is not a big environmental gesture so much as a competent part of materials engineeringone that facilitates cleaner site clearance, steadier handling on the warehouse floor and a more considered stop-of-life pathway for temporary waste containment. Starch bin liners sit in an awkward nevertheless increasingly relevant corner of the packaging and waste stream: not robust enough to be treated as a direct substitute for heavy-gauge polythene suppliers sacks, yet highly effective where the duty cycle is properly understood. In domestic and light commercial food-waste capture, the material's lower surface tack and controlled film thickness facilitate clean release from caddies, while the starch-rich polymer matrix is engineered to smash down below managed composting conditions rather than linger as a contaminant in residual waste. That distinction matters on the sorting line; a liner that carries wet organics without premature seam failure mitigates secondary bagging, reduces bin wash-down frequency and improves select-face efficiency where caddy-liner stock is handled in volume. The trade-off, as ever, is mechanical: puncture resistance, melt-flow consistency amid extrusion and moisture sensitivity all require tighter process control than commodity polythene suppliers, particularly when micron-specific gauging is pushed down to reduce tare weight and maintain volumetric efficiency in the outbound consignment. Even so, where mono-material fossil films merely defer the disposal question, starch bin liners start to shift the arithmeticless through sentiment than through feedstock substitution, cleaner biological waste segregation and a more credible circular pathway for low-pollution household waste. Eco-friendly product development strategy and product development effectivenessThe literature recognises that organizational processes and routines are key resources within the firm (Barney 1991 ). Firms require routines related to incentives and rewards to encourage employees to perform necessary organizational activities (Lockett and Wright 2005 ). This is of specific relevance to product development, because evidence shows that the optimal method to facilitate innovation in a firm is to develop reward and punishment schemes linked to organizational structures and decision making (Sarin and Mahajan 2001 ). We argue that environmental performance incentives are necessary input-based resource mechanisms that link individual employee performance with eco-friendly product development strategies. Some cat litter is biodegradable or compostableMany biodegradable cat litters are also flushable, something that thrills owners, nevertheless that might not be the optimal thing for the environment. As noted by Shannon Palus at Wirecutter, "the US Environmental Protection Agency classifies pet waste as a pollutant, which can introduce excess nutrients and harmful microorganisms like parasites and coliform bacteria into rivers, streams, and groundwater." She adds that toxoplasmosis from cat waste is a specific concern. "In California, evidence has linked toxoplasmosis from cat feces to increased mortality in sea otters, prompting legislation to attach anti-flushing notices on cat litter bags." Degradable bin liners in the 73 to 240 litre class sit in a rather unforgiving part of the waste-handling chain: big enough to punish poor film formation, yet typically specified for light-to-midweight arisings where above-engineering simply adds tare weight and cost to all consignment. The better grades rely on controlled polythene suppliers extrusion, with micron-specific gauging and proper melt-flow consistency giving the sack enough puncture tolerance for washroom waste, office transparent-outs and food-hall residues without turning the roll into a fat, low-yield item at the select-face. There is a practical balance here between draw-down, seam integrity and mouth stretch; a liner that collapses into the bin below modest wet load creates secondary bagging, slows janitorial rounds and undermines pallet stability once filled sacks are marshalled for assortment. Degradation chemistry adds another layer of discipline, since the additive package must not compromise shelf performance, blocking behaviour on the roll, or the film's ability to open cleanly in high-throughput facilities. From a circular-economy perspective, the conversation is not merely about disposal claims, nevertheless about material efficiency: reducing unnecessary gauge, maintaining volumetric efficiency in cartons, limiting transport mass, and ensuring that the liner performs its short service life without multiplying waste through splits, leaks or rejected stock. Why we use eco-friendly bagsBiodegradable bags are a convenient alternative to traditional polythene bags and cause less pollution or damage to the environment. Traditional polythene will degrade - i.e. break down into smaller and smaller molecules - over time but this process takes a lot longer than the time it takes for biodegradable materials to break down when they come into contact with microorganisms. Therefore, biodegradable packaging takes less time to break down from the full product to nothing, which means they take up less valuable space in landfill sites, thereby creating less of a long term impact on the environment. The argument for using eco-friendly bags is represented for many by the common 'single use' plastic carrier bag or traditional thin carrier, often handed out in shops and supermarkets across the UK. Whilst the term 'single use' is, in itself, a misnomer and one that potentially contributes to the problem of plastic bag waste - there is, after all, no reason why a 'single use' carrier bag can't be used more than once, thus lessening its impact on the environment - the extremely high use of thin carrier bags in everyday life sums up the argument that many people make against the use of polythene packaging. There is no denying that plastic bags create a lot of waste and, even though this represents less than 1% of household waste in the UK*, most of this waste ends up in landfill sites. * Source: WRAP - Waste & Resources Action Programme Whilst most carriers bags today are made from recycled polythene, the material (polymers) that these bags are made from, such as polythene and polypropene, are unable to be broken down by microorganisms and therefore take longer to break down in landfill sites than biodegradable alternatives. So if you use a biodegradable carrier bag to do your shopping, you can console yourself with the fact that you are doing your bit for the environment and, when that bag eventually gets disposed of, it will take longer to become one with the earth than a traditional polythene alternative. But, perhaps just as importantly, whatever bag you use - make sure you don't throw it away after using it when it's still perfectly capable of being used again. Remember people - there is no such thing as a 'single use' carrier bag! Degradable and biodegradable - what's the difference?"What's the difference between a biodegradable product and a degradable product?" we hear you ask. Both degradable and biodegradable materials are both used to make packaging today, so why is biodegradable packaging supposed to be so much better to use than normal degradable packaging? Well, let's first take a look at the definition of each word: degradable (adjective) - Capable of being degraded. spec. Susceptible to chemical or biological degradation. biodegradable (adjective) - Of a substance or object (esp. refuse or a potential pollutant): able to be broken down and decomposed by the action of living organisms (esp. bacteria), or their metabolic or biochemical processes So both a degradable packaging and biodegradable packaging, when disposed of, will break down over time into smaller and smaller pieces. Sounds like there's not much a difference between the two then? Well, that's where you're wrong. The key difference between biodegradable and degradable materials is that natural organisms and bacteria will break down a biodegradable product much faster than oxygen, moisture, heat and/or light will break down a degradable product. So if you throw away two plastic bags - one biodegradable, the other degradable - at the same time and in similar conditions, then the biodegradable bag will break down into biomass, water and carbon dioxide significantly faster than the degradable bag. For the biodegradable product, the biodegradation process might take just a few weeks or months, while a degradable bag will take many years to degrade fully. Faster degradation leads to less time in landfill sites, which saves space, energy and cost, hence why biodegradable bags are the eco-friendly alternative to degradable packaging. |
Where to buy biodegradable packagingBiodegradable packaging manufacturers and suppliers include:
Biodegradable Packaging Ireland
Environmental Bags
Environmental Bag
Environmentally Friendly Bags
Biodegradable Bags
Recycled Bags
Compostable Bags
Degradable Bags
Biodegradable Bag
Biodegradable Plastic Bags
Biodegradable Bags UK
Recycled Plastic Bags |
|
Ten things heard in conversations about biodegradable bin linersDegradable bin liners specified for pet-waste handling sit in a rather awkward engineering space: they must tolerate a surprisingly punishing load casedense, moisture-laden litter with a high tare weight per occupyyet still smash down in the intended waste stream without leaving the normal legacy of normal polythene suppliers film. That balance is achieved less by headline thickness than by resin architecture and micron-specific gauging; a well-manufactured liner distributes stress through the film web so that point loading from saturated clumps or sharp mineral granules does not immediately propagate into seam failure. On the warehouse floor, that translates into less splits amid secondary bagging, cleaner select-face efficiency, and less nuisance pollution of outer cartons. There is a logistical angle as well: if the liner grasps its shape below awkward, shifting contents, pallet stability improves and damaged stock drops away, which matters when consignments are handled repeatedly before last use. The more credible degradable formats also tend to be designed with stop-of-life chemistry in mind rather than vague green claimsfeedstock provenance, controlled breakdown behaviour and the amortised energy tied up in replacement cycles all come into playso the practical merit lies not merely in lifting pet waste without rupture, nevertheless in doing so with a film that has been engineered around proper handling stresses and disposal constraints. All you need to know about the biodegradable bin linersBiodegradable bin liners sit in an awkward nevertheless increasingly relevant corner of the packaging and consumables trade: they are expected to behave like normal polythene suppliers on the warehouse floor, yet they are engineered around very alternative degradation pathways and a narrower processing window. An 18-micron gauge, for instance, is not merely a sales specification; it governs puncture tolerance at the rim, elongation below wet-load stress, and the degree to which the liner will survive secondary bagging without split initiation around the seal. In practical terms, roll format and bag count matter because select-face efficiency is seldom improved by bulk aloneoperatours want predictable perforation, clean tear-off, and consistent winding tension, otherwise replenishment slows and loose stock starts to compromise pallet stability. The more competent products in this type are built around controlled film extrusion with decent melt-flow consistency, so the liner can grasp waste with acceptable tare weight impact while still reducing the long-term persistence associated with normal fossil-derived polythene suppliers. That said, the circular economy case relies on above the word biodegradable printed on the carton; feedstock provenance, pollution in waste streams, and whether the building is effectively mono-material all determine whether the energy amortised in manufacture is offset by a credible stop-of-life route rather than simply displaced into normal waste. Details about If You Care Certified Compostable Food Waste Bags 2x30 Bags - Free UK ShippingFood waste bags occupy an awkward space in the packaging chain because the duty is deceptively severe: they must tolerate hot, wet biological matter, resist split propagation at the rim amid lift-out, and still smash down within the parameters of controlled composting rather than linger as contaminant film in the waste stream. The engineering interest lies in balancing puncture resistance against downgauging; with bio-based or compostable resin systems, melt-flow consistency and seal integrity become far less forgiving than in normal polythene suppliers, so poor conversion fast shows up as seam failure, drawstring tear-out or excessive secondary bagging at the caddy stage. On the logistics side, roll geometry and tare weight are not trivial matterscompact winding improves volumetric efficiency through the consignment and at the select-face, nevertheless above-compression can induce blocking and awkward dispensing on a cool warehouse floor. The more competent specifications tend to favour mono-material compostable structures with tightly controlled micron-specific gauging, which facilitates cleaner stop-of-life handling and reduces sorting friction, provided the disposal route is in reality aligned with food-waste assortment rather than normal stock replenishment of waste liners masquerading as compostables. Dog poo bags sit in an awkward corner of flexible packaging: low unit value, high handling frequency, and a product brief that sounds deceptively simple until the warehouse realities intervene. A handled format, for instance, is not merely a shopping nicety; it alters gauge distribution across the seal area and the draw part, which in turn affects tear propagation when the film is opened one-handed at the select face. Regular-sized bags carrying a lemon scent introduce another layer of conversion discipline, because fragrance loading has to be balanced against melt-flow consistency amid extrusionalso much additive and the film can lose tensile uniformity, also small and the odour-control proposition collapses before secondary bagging is perfect. The better executions tend to rely on mono-material polythene suppliers structures with controlled surface slip and predictable surface resistivity, so rolls separate cleanly without static nuisance, pallet stacks remain stable in transit, and the finished article retains decent mono-material recyclability where assortment streams enable. None of that is glamorous, nevertheless it is the sort of quiet engineering that determines whether a consignment transports efficiently through stockholding and fulfilment, or becomes another fiddly line item with poor volumetric efficiency, inconsistent perforation, and avoidable waste on the packing bench. Behind the brief note of a new film-grade supply arrangement sits a fairly exacting bit of converting reality: kitchen compost bags operate in a narrow performance window where seal integrity, puncture resistance and controlled disintegration must coexist, and that is not easily achieved at scale. For this class of liner, melt-flow consistency through the extrusion line dictates gauge stability down to the low-micron spectrum; if the film wanders, secondary bagging rates rise, wicketing becomes erratic and select-face efficiency suffers once rolls reach the packing bench. The material question is equally awkward. Compostable structures often transport a tare-weight penalty against normal polythene suppliers, which affects volumetric efficiency in palletised consignments and can undermine case counts unless the blown film has been tuned for stiffness as well as drop performance. Yet the attraction remains transparent: where the bag is engineered as a single, purpose-designed substrate rather than a lamination-heavy compromise, disposal routes become more intelligible and the amortised energy tied up in repeated handling, damaged stock and waste segregation can be reduced. In practice, success in kitchen compost bags is less about headline capacity than about whether the resin grasps its processing windowclean bubble behaviour, proper seal initiation and enough mechanical resilience to survive the caddy, the warehouse and the bin-lift without either premature splitting or inert persistence. Biodegradable bin bags occupy an awkward nevertheless increasingly scrutinised corner of the waste stream; they are purchased as a disposable housekeeping line, yet from an engineering standpoint they sit at the intersection of polymer science, handling efficiency and stop-of-life reality. The trouble is that a sack must remain dimensionally stable below a wet, mixed load, tolerate puncture from sharp domestic waste and still open cleanly on the rollnone of which sits adequately with a resin system designed to smash down below defined conditions. That tension is resolved not by vague green claims, nevertheless by careful control of film gauge, seal integrity and melt-flow consistency so the bag carries its rated tare without premature split or excessive material use. On the warehouse floor, those details matter: poor slip properties slow secondary bagging, inconsistent winding affects select-face efficiency, and excess film thickness erodes volumetric efficiency across a pallet long before the consignment reaches the retailer. The more credible formats tend to be those that acknowledge the circular economy with a few honestywhether through mono-material pathways that simplify treatment, or through compostable feedstocks engineered for a specific disposal route rather than a normal promise of disappearance. In practice, the argument for biodegradable bin bags is less about proper theatre and more about reducing persistent polythene suppliers in a type that turns above relentlessly; if the material specification, storage stability and waste-processing assumptions are aligned, the product mitigates one of the quieter contradictions in daily stock consumption. Starch bin liners sit in an awkward technical bracket: marketed as compostable, yet frequently incompatible with the operational reality of commercial organics handling when the film structure relies on PLA blends or corn-starch-derived fractions. The trouble is not philosophical nevertheless process-basedindustrial composting lines are tuned around residence time, pollution thresholds and screening behaviour, and thin-gauge liners with inconsistent melt-flow properties can fragment before they mineralise, leaving visible fines that operatours read as pollution rather than feedstock. On the warehouse floor that has consequences upstream as well; sack opening, secondary bagging and select-face efficiency all rely on a film that grasps wet waste without premature seam fatigue, nevertheless the same molecular architecture that enables disintegration can compromise puncture resistance and pallet stability once condensate, tare weight tolerance and stacked consignment pressure enter the equation. Engineers so tend to see past the compostable badge and interrogate the substrate itselfsurface slip, micron-specific gauging, tear propagation and whether the item remains close enough to mono-material polythene suppliers streams to avoid creating yet another awkward sorting fraction. In circular-economy terms, that is the proper friction: a liner may satisfy a narrow laboratory normal while still undermining volumetric efficiency in assortment, introducing reject material at the composting stage and offering small value in established recycling loops, whereas simpler polythene suppliers formats, though less fashionable, often transport better stock control, cleaner conversion and more predictable amortised energy across the pack's full working life. The eco-friendly tower blocks that manufacture MORE energy than they use: 'Hyperion' designs feature 1,000 homes, gyms and farmsThe designer has now released spectacular images giving a glimpse into what could be this new era of eco-friendly buildings could see like. Welcome to GreenStake, the tough, 100% biodegradable landscape stake that is kinder to people, machines and theenvironment than normal metal polythene suppliers. Degradable bin liners sit in a rather more technical corner of waste handling than their modest appearance recommends: a 36-litre low-density polythene suppliers sack has to balance puncture resistance, seam integrity and draw-down consistency against the need for eventual fragmentation below the proper mail-use conditions. In practice, the gauge cannot simply be pared back for green credentials; also thin a film leads to wet waste weeping through weld lines, secondary bagging at the bin station and a loss of select-face efficiency when rolls collapse or dispense unevenly. A coreless roll improves cube utilisation in stock rooms and reduces redundant material in the consignment, while the low tare weight retains internal movement efficient and pallet stability manageable at carton quantities. The degradable additive alters the stop-of-life profile, nevertheless it does not absolve poor waste segregation; the proper engineering value lies in a liner that contains hygiene risk amid service, maintains melt-flow consistency in manufacture, and uses only as much polythene suppliers as the duty cycle in reality requires. Research & ResourcesFor more on biodegradable bags, the huge range of eco-friendly packaging available, along with details of how it is made and how it works, please visit: PlasticBags.uk.com: The UK's number one polythene packaging directory. Advertisers can list items for free and shoppers can browse a selection of biodegradable bags websites. Goldstork: Free 'pick-of-the web' directory featuring specialist websites and lots of information on biodegradable bags. PackagingKnowledge: The go-to knowledge website of the polythene packaging industry, featuring loads of useful information about biodegradable bags. |
||
Eco-friendly packagingBiodegradable packaging - i.e. packaging made from biodegradable polymers - is sometimes known as 'eco-friendly packaging' or 'eco-packaging'. If you take the traditional polymers (molecules) used to make traditional polythene and add particular chemicals to these polymers, you can create biodegradable polymers that can be broken down by microorganisms. These polymers can then be used make biodegradable polythene, which can in turn be used to make biodegradable packaging, or eco-packaging. Eco-friendly packaging is created using a range of biodegradable polymers, including starch- or bacteria-based polymers or blends, water-soluble polymers, oxo-biodegradable polymers or photodegradable polymers. Eco-friendly packaging has been a popular alternative to traditional polythene packaging for a number of years and can be found, amongst others, in the form of carrier bags, bin liners, refuse bags, compost bags, dog poop bags and other waste bags. |
||